https://aetherczar.substack.com/p/521-origins-of-relativity...but it's also been rendered absolutely clear that he didn’t even UNDERSTAND what he was plagiarizing.
There were many milestones along the road to E = mc²
Who first suggested matter-energy equivalence? Preston in 1875.
The relativistic nature of energy? Newcomb in 1889.
A correctly derived result in a limited case? Poincaré in 1900.
The actual formula? De Pretto in 1903.
The correct result in a different limited case and arguing it should be generalized outside the context of electromagnetic energy? Einstein in 1905.
The correct result rigorously proven to be generally applicable? That was von Laue in 1911.
And Einstein cited none of these predecessors.
As Ohanian notes, “Oddly, even today von Laue’s general proof of the E = mc² relation is not widely known.
In 1912, Einstein adapted von Laue’s proof for an omnibus volume on recent advances in physics.
The war delayed publication until 1924.
Einstein’s contribution was NOT included, because he refused the publisher’s request to update it.
Einstein reused his submission in a 1914 paper and in his Princeton lectures in 1921, published later that year as The Meaning of Relativity.
Nowhere did he acknowledge von Laue. What’s more, Einstein’s paraphrase of von Laue included what Ohanian characterized as “the zaniest mistake in his entire oeuvre, an absolutely nonsensical mistake.”
It’s really no surprise that Einstein wasn’t as intelligent as he is commonly portrayed.
He couldn't even understand the work he was stealing well enough to paraphrase it.
So you can expect the jews to fight this simple truth tooth and claw, since his purported intelligence is one of the main support pillars of the myth of "high jewish intelligence".
On the contrary, it's clear that they simply steal anything they can get their greasy little paws on.
It's little wonder they like niggers so much.
