Sign into an existing account

Now it makes sense why they attack Asians at such a rate, black on black violence.

Exploding batteries and exploding phones.

It is like drunk me set a trap.

no way we won already.

Noam Chomsky, the renowned political dissident and intellectual, has long been a vocal critic of U.S. foreign policy, and his scathing commentary on the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is no exception. Through his extensive writings and speeches, Chomsky has painted a picture of USAID not as a benevolent force for global development, but as a tool of American imperialism, cloaked in the language of humanitarianism. For those in the intelligence community, Chomsky’s insights offer a provocative lens through which to examine the agency’s true motives and operations.

USAID and the CIA: A Blurred Line

One of Chomsky’s most damning critiques is the blurred line between USAID and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). He notes, “Parts of the nominally Government-controlled areas are actually run by the CIA, and no one seems sure where the CIA ends and the civilian aid program, USAID, begins.” This observation raises unsettling questions about the extent to which USAID operates as a front for covert intelligence operations. If true, it suggests that the agency’s humanitarian efforts may be secondary to its role in advancing U.S. geopolitical interests, often through undemocratic means.

Economic Exploitation and the “Taiwan of the Caribbean”

Chomsky’s analysis of USAID’s role in Haiti is particularly illuminating. He describes how USAID, under the guise of development, implemented programs to turn Haiti into the “Taiwan of the Caribbean.” This strategy, rooted in the principle of comparative advantage, forced Haiti to import food and other commodities from the United States while its people toiled in U.S.-owned assembly plants under deplorable conditions. The result was not economic prosperity for Haitians, but rather the enrichment of American investors and the Haitian elite, coupled with a devastating decline in local wages and agricultural self-sufficiency.

Chomsky highlights how USAID and the World Bank, under the Reagan administration, explicitly sought to dismantle Haitian agriculture, pushing the country toward a model of exploitative assembly plants. This deliberate destruction of local food systems left Haiti dependent on foreign imports, a dependency that only deepened under subsequent administrations. The consequences of these policies were catastrophic, contributing to widespread poverty and political instability, which in turn justified further U.S. intervention.

Democracy Promotion or Regime Change?

USAID’s involvement in “democracy promotion” has also come under Chomsky’s scrutiny. He points to the agency’s role in facilitating military coups and undermining democratically elected governments, often under the banner of supporting freedom and democracy. In Nicaragua, for example, USAID funneled millions of dollars through non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to overthrow the democratically elected Sandinista government. Similarly, in Honduras, USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) provided funding to organizations that opposed President Manuel Zelaya and supported the 2009 military coup.

Chomsky quotes Allen Weinstein, one of the founders of NED, who candidly admitted, “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.” This admission underscores the extent to which USAID’s “democracy promotion” initiatives are often indistinguishable from covert regime change operations. By funding opposition groups and maintaining a “low profile,” USAID effectively acts as an arm of U.S. foreign policy, advancing American interests under the guise of humanitarian aid.

The Militarization of Aid

Chomsky also sheds light on USAID’s role in militarizing police forces and supporting counterinsurgency operations in client states. In the Philippines, for instance, USAID and the CIA trained police under the public safety program for “eventual para-military and counterinsurgency operations.” This militarization of civilian institutions not only undermines local governance but also perpetuates cycles of violence and repression, often in service of maintaining U.S. influence.

A Legacy of Exploitation

Chomsky’s critiques reveal a pattern of exploitation and manipulation that belies USAID’s humanitarian rhetoric. Whether through the destruction of local economies, the facilitation of coups, or the militarization of aid, the agency has consistently served as an instrument of U.S. empire. As Chomsky succinctly puts it, USAID’s mission is not to promote genuine development or democracy, but to impose “consent without consent” on vulnerable nations, ensuring their compliance with American interests.

For those in the intelligence community, Chomsky’s analysis serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and contradictions inherent in U.S. foreign aid. While USAID may present itself as a force for good, its actions often tell a different story—one of exploitation, coercion, and control. As the agency continues to operate in some of the world’s most vulnerable regions, it is imperative to question whose interests it truly serves.

In the end, Chomsky’s work challenges us to look beyond the veneer of humanitarianism and confront the uncomfortable realities of U.S. foreign policy. For USAID, this means reckoning with a legacy that is as much about empire as it is about aid. For the rest of us, it means demanding accountability and transparency from an agency that wields immense power, often with little oversight or scrutiny.

https://www.amazon.com/SEEING-HITLER-Eyewitness-Account-Temples/dp/0578438704


dude died in south america in argentina. so the whole war was meant to kill white christian gentiles by the millions. both sides cooperated in this aim. also out of it came the worthless UN and the unholy state of israel